Life is thermal

Revealing the fraud of the greenhouse

Just numbers, no blankets — 13 april, 2017

Just numbers, no blankets

Its weird that someone would say that earth is 33° “warmer than it should be”,  especially when they already reduced the amount of heat by 30% before the calculation started. My approach is that everything is exactly what it should be, and if someone says that there is heat coming from an ice-cold atmosphere, my first thought is that someone miscalculated. And that someone is less than normally talented.

Gravity stumbled in at the end where it seems like it acts like a loop of thermal energy radiated balanced by gravity pulling mass to the surface. Its a reasonable claim I think, heat expands mass and lift the atmosphere. Displacing mass is work, and work needs input of energy. Earth only radiate 240W/m^2 to space but surface emission is 390W, a heat-gravity loop at the surface could be an explanation. Since the atmosphere is limited to mostly longer waves of radiation it gets it´s energy from the surface, the heat source. The surface intensity is entering the equation as a potential of approximately-385W/m^2 equal to 288K. Since the surface subtract 385W in the equation which is transferred to the atmosphere, gravity is a conservative force keeping mass and heat balanced.

All points of interest above the surface now have a clear independent relationship which needs only one number, in line with theory. I view gravity as a balanced force acting with a power equal to surface emission of thermal energy.

The blackbody hemispheric intensity gives another relationship between the effective temperature and the temperature at the tropopause, than the spherical shell where absorbed and emitted intensity at the surface is TSI/(4/3)^2 and 1/2*TSI(4/3)^2. Both methods give close results. The fraction 4/3 is from the volume of a sphere. Used as non-participating matter, it is an ideal case like the surface of a blackbody. It is a good fit.

The earth core is said to have a temperature of about 6000 kelvin, I assume that it has the same temperature as the surface of the sun.

If we use the same approach as for the surface and atmosphere, the internal layers decrease by 3/4 for each surface and another 3/4 for the volume above that surface. If the core is 5780 Kelvin and there is 4 pairs of surfaces and volumes, the surface receives 0.0000000567*5780⁴/4^8 W/m² from the core, and 0,0000000567*255⁴*4W/m² from the sun. I doubt cold air is the heat source if the balance is so accurate between the core and the sun.



Temperature is the signal, it is the only force/energy we observe in the universe, and it is independent of space and mass. My conclusion is that the temperature  is the first dimension. The one dimensional signal then expands in space through three dimensions, which is called space. The only difference between the signal and space three dimensions is time passed to define the expansion.  This turns the common definition of reality on its head, we instead have one dimension of energy that expands in three dimensions of time. Suddenly the expansion of the universe makes sense and its nature becomes logical in relation to observation and energy.

If we use the units for stress/pressure/thermal resistance and treat gravity as a radiated force acting to balance thermal radiation, gravity have the function of balancing the inflation of heat into a steady state conserving mass. With units for stress/pressure/thermal resistance in N/m^2 and inverse square law, we can see that the power is equal for emission of thermal radiation and emission of gravity.

There is no greenhouse effect, there is only temperature.






If we use the relationship:


There is another solution:


For emitted radiation from the surface, we need to balance it to the square, which is the source intensity: .  The incoming energy from the sun is balanced to the internal energy , and from the known mean addition of only 90mW from internal generation we can assume near perfect equilibrium of the solid sphere earth. That means that a nonparticipating spherical shell must contain a minimum of twice that amount, to balance incoming and outgoing radiation, and a body in equilibrium will behave in a similar way.


Now go and light a fire, combust fuel, use electricity from nuclear power and coal, anything that make energy flow outside our metabolism. That is what we are here for and that´s what we are good at. That is why earth looks like a bursting star-egg on the dark side, where it would be impossible to have light without humans putting it there.



Advanced measurments of bullshit — 27 mars, 2017

Advanced measurments of bullshit

In this post I will make a short description of pyrgeometers and IR-sensors that both use a thermopile as the fundamental mechanism for the function of the device. It will be clear to anyone interested that it cannot be used as proof for any radiative energy coming from a cold atmosphere that heats the earth surface.

In the blogposts over at scienceoffraud about radiation from the ass of the atmosphere, pyrgeometer measurements are used as proof of ”back-radiation”.

The thermopile (fig1) can be explained as a slightly more advanced thermometer with the difference that it measures a gradient across the material in the sensor, using a difference in voltage that depends on changes in conductivity arising from differences in the temperature of the material. It uses the difference to produce a value of heat transfer into, or out of, the device. In the case of the atmosphere it is a measured transfer from the device that is measured, the difference between the temperature of the device as a result of the surrounding temperature, to the temperature of the part exposed to the atmosphere.


Fig 1, composition of a thermopile


When used in a pyrgeometer, the device claimed to measure ”backradiation”, the thermopile is placed in a shell with a theremometer measuring the temperature of the device as a reference. The pyrgeometer is placed outside and according to Wikipedia it can at best have a range of 25 meters into the atmosphere above. In the device there is a thermopile measuring the gradient across itself as part of it is exposed to, and directed towards, the atmosphere above. The transfer of heat to the atmosphere above is calculated from the small gradient inside, that is assumed to continue into the atmosphere. In figure 2 the principle is shown for an IR-thermometer with a thermocouple inside. It is the same basic principle and here are the equations used for the function of device, shown below the picture.


Figure 2, the basic working principle for a IR-thermometer with the included equations.


In figure 3 we can see a section of a pyrgeometer and as you can see, there is nothing inside is capable of measuring IR-radiation over a distance in an atmosphere. To do that, you need a device for optical measurement, measuring photons and their wavelengths, not a net heat transfer “thermometer”.



Figure 3, a section drawing of a pyrgeometer


In figure 4 we can find a scetch of the working principle of the sensor body in the pyrgeometer, the thermopile. It is in Swedish but I think it is obvious what is shown. The text below translates as:

“The heat flow is determined by the small gradient caused, by the use of very sensitive thermo-elements. The energyflow of outgoing photons is calculated using the Stefan-Boltzmann law based on the sensorbodys measured temperature.”

In the drawing you can see red and blue arrows claimed to show in- and outgoing photons. This is not a correct description, logically it can only measure a gradient inside the sensor, as it doesn´t have any optical view beyond its own material. The blue arrows indicate what is implied as incoming photons, but in a situation where the temperature in the direction of measurement is lower than that of the device, there is only indirect indication of temperature-difference by the small internal gradient. What the device does is measure the heat transfer from the sensor, and then that difference is wrongfully claimed to be incoming radiation. I don´t say that there cannot be any incoming radiation, just that this device is definitely not capable of measuring it.



Figure 4, a drawing of the claimed measurement of incoming radiation from an atmosphere



When you see someone claiming that ”back-radiation” from the atmosphere is proven by measurements from IR-cameras or pyrgeometers, you know this person have no clue of what they are talking about. These are devices that have the “greenhouse effect” built into them, if you use them for atmospheric measurements from groundlevel. A thermopile is an excellent, sensitive device for use in other situations, but not to measure “back-radiation”, or “the ghost of the greenhouse” as I prefer to call it. To measure a small gradient over a thermopile and extend that measurement into the atmosphere claiming it to be a measurement of incoming photons, is distilled bullshit. Maybe a more refined form of bullshit, but nothing else than bullshit.


Have a nice day and don`t forget to use a lot of oil